Skip to main content
Insights

Co-Sourcing vs. In-Sourcing: The Optimal Solution for Tribal Governments and Federal Government Contractors

Insights

Co-Sourcing vs. In-Sourcing: The Optimal Solution for Tribal Governments and Federal Government Contractors

Circle
Insights

Co-Sourcing vs. In-Sourcing: The Optimal Solution for Tribal Governments and Federal Government Contractors

Every week I see new job openings: Treasurer, Controller, CFO, Finance Director, Staff Accountant, Payroll Manager…

A recent Wall Street Journal article states that the number of organizations citing “insufficient accounting personnel” has increased, and recently, there’s been a trend to replace the CFO when audits are late or have deficiencies.

Organizations managing federal funds, such as Tribal Governments and Federal Government Contractors, are facing unique challenges on top of their staffing challenges. These include strict compliance requirements, complex financial reporting standards, and the ever-present need to secure additional funding through grants and contracts.

To tackle these complexities, organizations often debate between in-sourcing (handling tasks in-house), outsourcing (fully abdicating responsibility) and co-sourcing (partnering with an external provider while retaining control internally). Understanding the differences between these approaches and recognizing the benefits of co-sourcing can be pivotal in maintaining compliance and achieving organizational goals.

Defining Co-Sourcing, Outsourcing, and In-Sourcing

In-sourcing involves managing all functions internally within the organization. This approach relies entirely on the internal staff to handle every aspect of the overhead functions, such as accounting and payroll. While in-sourcing offers maximum control and integration within the organization, it can also lead to resource strains and inefficiencies if the internal team lacks the necessary expertise, training, and capacity.

Outsourcing involves delegating entire functions to an external service provider. This third-party entity assumes full responsibility for the tasks, often off-site. Outsourcing can provide cost savings and access to specialized expertise but may also lead to a loss of control and potential disconnects between the organization and the service provider.

Co-sourcing, on the other hand, is a collaborative approach where the organization and an external provider share responsibilities for specific functions. This method combines internal and external resources, allowing for greater control and integration while leveraging external expertise and efficiency. Co-sourcing is also seen as retaining and strengthening financial sovereignty, in contract to full-on outsourcing.

The Benefits of Co-Sourcing

Enhancing Capacity and Efficiency: For many Tribal Governments and Federal Government Contractors, maintaining an efficient and compliant operation with limited internal resources and unfilled positions can be challenging. Co-sourcing provides a balanced solution by supplementing the internal team with external expertise, thereby enhancing capacity and efficiency without overburdening internal staff.

Example: A Tribal Government facing a backlog in financial reporting due to understaffing can benefit from co-sourcing. The co-sourcing partner brings in additional resources to clear the backlog and move the Tribe forward with regular, month-end and annual closes, while internal staff retain oversight and strategic direction.

Expanding Capacity for New Grants and Contracts: Securing new federal grants and contracts requires meticulous preparation and comprehensive financial documentation. Many organizations lack the capacity to pursue these opportunities due to existing workload constraints. Co-sourcing helps bridge this gap by providing the necessary expertise and additional workforce, enabling organizations to expand their capacity and pursue new funding opportunities confidently.

Example: A Federal Government Contractor aiming to bid for multiple new contracts can use co-sourcing to enhance their accounting and financial reporting capabilities. The external partner supports the increased workload, ensuring compliance and accurate documentation, while the internal team focuses on strategic aspects of the bids.

Mitigating Compliance Risks: Compliance with federal grant and contract rules is non-negotiable. Non-compliance can result in severe penalties, including the loss of funding. Co-sourcing offers a proactive approach to managing compliance risks. By leveraging the specialized knowledge of a co-sourcing partner, organizations can ensure adherence to federal regulations, timely and accurate reporting, and the implementation of best practices.

Example: An organization struggling with the complexity of federal compliance can engage a co-sourcing partner with expertise in federal grant regulations. The co-sourcing arrangement allows the Tribe, Government, or Company to stay compliant while maintaining oversight and strategic control.

The Case for Co-Sourcing

While outsourcing can provide immediate relief, the benefits of co-sourcing are particularly compelling for organizations that accept and expend federal funds. Co-sourcing fosters a collaborative environment, blending the strengths of internal teams with external expertise. This approach not only enhances capacity and compliance but also ensures continuity, control, and strategic alignment.

Why Co-Sourcing is the Optimal Choice:

Cost Effectiveness: Co-sourcing often represents the similar costs that would be incurred with full-time employees’ salary, plus fringe benefits.

Revenue Generating Support: Co-sourcing allows organizations to scale up quickly – to apply for more grants, take on more contracts, and serve as a support mechanism that enables the organization to grow.

Enhanced Control: Co-sourcing maintains internal oversight and strategic direction.

Flexibility and Scalability: Organizations can scale support up or down based on current needs.

Specialized Expertise Saves Time: Access to external experts with experience, ready to hit the ground running, saves time and money.

Improved Compliance: Enables proactive management of federal grant and contract compliance risks, leading to clean audits and better agency relationships.

Take the Next Step!

For Tribal Governments and Federal Government Contractors, the decision between co-sourcing and in-sourcing is crucial. Co-sourcing stands out as a balanced, flexible, cost effective, and strategic solution that addresses immediate needs while positioning organizations for future success.

If your organization is facing backlogs, seeking to expand capacity, or navigating the complexities of federal compliance, co-sourcing could be the key to unlocking your full potential with a team of ready experts. To explore how co-sourcing can benefit your organization, book a consult with us today. Let’s work together to achieve compliance, efficiency, and growth.

By leveraging the strengths of both internal and external resources, co-sourcing offers a pathway to overcoming challenges and seizing new opportunities. Don’t let backlogs, capacity constraints, or compliance risks hold you back— Native Advisory is here to help!

Sign up to receive updates, insights, resources and more

Skip to content